Dineen's Goalies Battle Different Opponents


Dineen is making some interesting goalie decisions. AP Photo/J Pat Carter

It’s no secret around the NHL and the community that the Panthers are better than years past.  They’ve got scoring, effort, and consistency.  As an added plus, we’ve been getting solid goaltending from both our netminders, Jose Theodore and Jacob Markstrom.  At this point of the year, I have nothing bad to say about Dineen just yet.  However, I noticed something in the schedule recently that was interesting to me.

One could argue that the 21-year-old Markstrom has been slotted against bigger, tougher, more offensively-minded teams.  With only a couple of NHL games under his belt and only a couple of preseason stints, Markstrom wouldn’t seem like the ideal player in high pressure situations.  That role might be better applied to Theodore, a league veteran who played big games every night in Montreal.

But that’s not how Dineen is doing it.  Look at the teams they each have started against:

Jacob Markstrom:

@ Washington Capitals

@ Montreal Canadiens

@ Ottawa Senators

vs. Chicago Blackhawks

Compare that murderers’ row of opponents with his counterpart.

Jose Theodore:

@ New York Islanders

@ Pittsburgh Penguins

vs. Tampa Bay Lightning

@ Tampa Bay Lightning

vs. Buffalo Sabres

vs. New York Islanders

@ Buffalo Sabres

vs. Winnipeg Jets

There certainly is a big difference.  Markstrom has played against teams with explosive offenses this year, as well as in hostile territories like the Bell Centre, Verizon Center, and Scotiabank Place.  You would think that Dineen would want to keep Markstrom out of those environments: those buildings are loud and the team who play there do not let up.

Theodore’s schedule is no cakewalk, but it is a little skewed.  Those Penguins that he played against were without both Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin.  Otherwise, Theodore hasn’t played a lot of those tough matchups.  His worst might have been against the Lightning at the St. Pete Times Forum.

My point is this: wouldn’t you assume that Markstrom would be starting against the Jets and Islanders of the world before going straight after the toughest teams in the league in his first career starts?  The answer is yes, so I’m fascinated why Dineen has the situation in reverse.  If Theodore is indeed the starting goalie in Sunrise, then why is he playing the big games?  No idea, but maybe this a harbinger of things to come for the Panthers.

Considering how well Markstrom has played in these high-intensity games, I might guess that he has wrestled the full-time starting job away from Theodore.  Now we have a goalie situation closer to the DeBoer years: Jose is 1A, Jacob is 1B.  Not a problem, I say.  It was always a plus when you confidently pick the hot goalie over the cooler one.

However, if Markstrom can continue to illicit trust from the head coach Dineen, he might just be the team’s full time #1 goalie by the end of the year.  For now, we’ll just have to see.

Thanks for reading, please comment!

Follow the Rat Pack on Twitter: me @ScottFMullin, Frank Rekas @TheRatTrick, David Lasseter @davidlasseter, Josh Luecht @joshluecht, Patrick McLaughlin @PatrickRattrick, Cameron Tahernia @Lord_Panther, Paige Lewis @peejlewiz, and David Rodriguez @davidbub_2.   Also, please join our Facebook Fan Page and hit the like button, send us photos, and make some comments.

Tags: Kevin Dineen Kevin Dineen Has Decision

  • KarlSelvig

    Oh I don’t know that I read that much into it. It’s not like Montreal was flying high when Markstrom started against them, and the Ottawa game following that can just be seen as starting the hot goalie as Marky played well against the Habs. I’d argue that the Pittsburgh game, two against Tampa, and 2 against Buffalo were “bigger games” than 3 of the 4 Makrstrom played in.

    You could also look at it like Dineen is putting in the “B” goalie against tougher teams to force home the fact that the team in front of him will have to step their game up to compete. Put in goalie “A” (whoever Dineen sees it as) and the team gets the mentality of “well we have our top goalie in, he can save our butt when we need him.” I just think it’s still a little early to be worrying about who’s starting when. Now when Clemmer is available, it’ll be a different story.

  • Scott Mullin

    Yeah, I don’t think this is a huge deal, and there are many different ways of looking at the situation. But I’d say playing in Canada for two games and in Washington is a tough task. We’ll see how this whole situation plays out. So long as we keep playing good hockey @KarlSelvig

  • KarlSelvig

    Oh I don’t know that I read that much into it. It’s not like Montreal was flying high when Markstrom started against them, and the Ottawa game following that can just be seen as starting the hot goalie as Marky played well against the Habs. I’d argue that the Pittsburgh game, two against Tampa, and 2 against Buffalo were “bigger games” than 3 of the 4 Makrstrom played in.

    You could also look at it like Dineen is putting in the “B” goalie against tougher teams to force home the fact that the team in front of him will have to step their game up to compete. Put in goalie “A” (whoever Dineen sees it as) and the team gets the mentality of “well we have our top goalie in, he can save our butt when we need him.” I just think it’s still a little early to be worrying about who’s starting when. Now when Clemmer is available, it’ll be a different story.

  • Scott Mullin

    Yeah, I don’t think this is a huge deal, and there are many different ways of looking at the situation. But I’d say playing in Canada for two games and in Washington is a tough task. We’ll see how this whole situation plays out. So long as we keep playing good hockey @KarlSelvig

  • FrankRekas

    @Scott Mullin@KarlSelvig Good points by you both. I kinda think that Dineen might be forcing the team to play more focused when Marky is in there. There is some validity to that. Either way, it’s working and if we have a 1a and a 1b, that’s fine with me as long as we’re winning. Clem is coming back, so something will have to happen there.

  • FrankRekas

    @Scott Mullin@KarlSelvig Good points by you both. I kinda thing that Dineen might be forcing the team to play more focused when Marky is in there. There is some validity to that. Either way, it’s working and if we have a 1a and a 1b, that’s fine with me as long as we’re winning. Clem is coming back, so something will have to happen there.